• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

Sedona City Councilmember Pete Furman

  • Home
  • About Pete
    • Meet Pete
    • Pete’s Priorities
    • Pete’s Perspectives
  • In the News
  • City Meetings
    • Upcoming Sedona City Meetings
    • Sedona City Meeting Summaries
  • Contact Pete
  • Show Search
Hide Search

In the News

The ‘adequate’ reign of Mayor Jablow is over

Pete Furman · October 3, 2025 ·

The ‘adequate’ reign of Mayor Jablow is over – Sedona Red Rock News

On Tuesday morning, Sept. 30, embattled Sedona Mayor Scott Jablow emailed the Sedona City Attorney to resign from office, ending his 34-month1 tenure.

Keeping Sedona residents informed, we were the first to break the news of his resignation, which should have happened 20 days earlier in execu­tive session on Sept. 10 before Sedona City Council subsequently voted 5-2 to censure him and demand his resignation for “interference with city staff/departments,” “creating/fostering a hostile work environment,” “breaking the confidentiality of attorney-client privilege” “circumven­tion of city council process,” “acting beyond the authority of the office of mayor,” “acting unilaterally” and “violating principles of ethical conduct for elected officials.”2

It should have happened 13 days earlier on Sept. 17 after our editorial, “For the good of Sedona, Mayor Scott Jablow must resign,” reinforcing council’s seven damning reasons they publicly shamed a colleague.

Any rational, wise and honorable leader would have taken the hint and quit the office with some dignity intact.

Unfortunately for Sedona, Jablow possesses none of those leadership skills, refused to resign and vowed to hold on, though he did figure out a 2026 reelection was untenable and announced he would not run.

On Sept. 19, a new allegation was filed, leading to another closed-door meeting with the city attorney and direction to investigate the claims. While these allegations are not yet public, we can only wonder if they are what led to the sudden reversal.

Due to Jablow’s defiance, council members discussed revising City Code and Council Procedures to add additional penalties to a censure resolution: Striking a council member from any liaison roles, banning access to the Mayor-Council conference room, taking away a city-funded cell phone, declining to pay travel expenses or docking a council member’s limited pay, effectively neutering all the perks of a censured official. Council will still discuss adding these penalties on Wednesday, Oct. 29.

Prior to that discussion, Jablow went rogue and tried to make a public statement bashing his colleagues for voting their conscience and admon­ishing him 13 days earlier. He began by blatantly misstating a headline from our newspaper3, then proceeded to read what would have been a lengthy rant before he was slapped down by both council members and the city attorney for speaking on issues not properly agendized.

Again, Jablow was breaking the rules by fostering a hostile work envi­ronment, circumventing the city council process and violating principles of ethical conduct for elected officials, reinforcing why he was censured earlier.

The next day, the rant was mistakenly posted to Facebook by a third party but quickly taken down, but not before local keyboard warriors snagged screenshots of the rant3. Two days later, he posted an edited version, but both were rife with factual errors, misstatements, falsehoods and what can only be described as lies, a term we journalists do not use lightly.

For instance, he falsely claimed that three Sedona Police Department staffers came forward with allegations of mistreatment and “Allegedly, out of fear of retaliation by the Chief, the employees decided not to pursue their complaints.”

This is so ridiculously false, it must be highlighted: Not only did the three staffers pursue their complaints, the city hired an outside firm — Revolutionary HR Consultants — to investigate them. We published a 2,100-word story on the investigation, posted the entire 29-page Report of Findings and Jablow even cited the misspelled “HR Revolutionary” by name three times in his Sept. 26 post4, so he knew that they pursued their complaints.

He also cites in his post that one of the complaints about the chief came in August 2024, “from the former Deputy Chief, who outlined safety-related issues.”

Jablow neglects to mention the name of the former deputy chief, Ryan Kwitkin, who Revolutionary HR suggested in May 2024 the city inves­tigate for allegations of misconduct discovered during interviews. Ten allegations of misconduct were “substantiated” and Kwitkin was fired by the city manager July 10. Kwitkin filed a $360,000 notice of claim against the city in August. A fired employee who is suing the city bashing his former supervisor? You don’t say.

If Jablow really had cause to displace the chief, he presented nothing to his colleagues and nothing to our newspaper to validate his “concerns.”

“It should be noted he NEVER asked to agendize an item his concerns. NEVER,” a council member wrote to us on Sept. 26.

But Jablow’s myopic push to oust Sedona’s first female police chief led her to file a 157-page harassment complaint against Jablow on July 27, detailing three years of “constant and continuous scrutiny, micromanage­ment and undermining of her position of authority” and “gender-based discrimination.” Jablow’s resignation comes just weeks before that inves­tigation becomes public.

Jablow claimed the council-manager form of government limited his ability to manage the city — but after 10 years and 11 months on council, he’s not new to the job — he should know it’s both Arizona state law and how Sedona’s municipal government works.

His greatest sin against Sedona residents, however, was the debacle over automated license plate reader cameras. Wowed by the new surveillance toy in early 2024, Jablow pushed ALPRs relentlessly by himself in order to track and surveil Sedona residents and visitors on city streets without their knowledge. He was told flat-out by the former city manager to cease acting unilaterally without his colleagues’ knowledge or approval, then proceeded anyway by contacting Verde Valley law enforcement leaders about their ALPR data and instructing them not to email city staff but him directly for “personal” research5. He pushed the new city manager in 2024 who seemed unaware of her predecessor’s rebuke of Jablow and signed off on the project appearing not to be aware of Jablow’s surreptitious behavior.

When she asked when she should schedule a public meeting, Jablow explicitly told her not to make it public6 — hiding from his own constitu­ents the proposed mass surveillance of their movements — 5th and 6th Amendments be damned — an utter betrayal of his duty as an elected official.

That revelation only came to light when furious readers notified us cameras were tracking them without warning [689 comments on our story as of Sept. 30]. Residents demanded answers from the city and council members heard from the public on Aug. 13, all learning for the first time how Jablow’s duplicitous actions wasted tens of thousands of tax dollars and engendered fear and distrust that will take years to rebuild.

When running for mayor in 2022, Jablow said his top three priorities were short-term rentals, OHVs regulations and affordable workforce housing, the reduction of which he largely attributed to short-term rentals.

On all three issues, Jablow failed utterly.

Despite all his talk to outside media outlets about the negative impacts of short-term rentals, there are more STRs in 2025 then when he was elected mayor, tripling since 2020 and now numbering more than 1,100. New STR legislation Jablow championed as the “fix” never became law and most bills were killed in committee; 11 died in 2024 alone without ever getting a floor vote. Jablow lacked the political charisma or swagger to convince lawmakers on his key issue.

Under the guise of “safety,” Jablow proposed an ordinance in April 2023 to ban OHVs on Sedona streets unless they had Department of Transportation-approved street-legal tires — a requirement that was tech­nically and legally impossible. Jablow penned a guest perspective in June focused on “safety.”7 Activist lawyers smacked down Jablow’s backdoor ban and all three of our state lawmakers said the proposal conflicted with numerous state laws.

Jablow tried to get the U.S. Forest Service to ban or limit OHVs on lands west of Sedona, serving not Sedona residents but landowners outside city limits and outside his jurisdiction, an utter dereliction of his purview and beyond the authority of a mayor.

When OHV rental owners bowed to the coercive power of the state to save their businesses, Jablow’s negotiated ordinance lacked any refer­ence to “airbags, stability control, crumple zones, rear bumpers and DOT-approved tires” proving the ordinance had nothing to do with safety but with getting OHV business to kowtow to his power. In the end, Jablow’s only “success” was getting a 15-mph OHV-only speed limit on ½-mile of Morgan Road.

When you pass an OHV driving on State Route 89A, remember him.

Jablow has completed no affordable workforce housing projects in his 34 months as mayor or 10 years on council. In fact, when counting several workforce housing areas that were sold to developers who proposed higher-end redevelopments, Sedona had a net workforce housing loss under Jablow’s leadership.

Jablow sent out campaign mailers in 2022, showing him with a shovel in hand8, which suggested he was a builder, but the photo was from the groundbreaking of SFD Station 6, not housing. Other than a toothless “housing shortage emergency” declaration, Jablow can point to no substantive achievements and ends as a footnote, sans legacy.

His high mark was installing a 9/11 memorial at Sedona Fire District Station 6 when he served on the SFD Governing Board. Unfortunately for us all in Sedona, he then sought higher office on Sedona City Council.

Back in 2022, we wrote that Jablow was “known to sway with the wind, changing his votes based on who last had his ear before a council meeting. Even allies and donors note this unsteady fickleness. Adaptability is a virtue, inconsistency a vice.” So Jablow’s Sept. 10 decision to remain and his Sept. 30 reversal to quit is no surprise — it was entirely expected.

Jablow did not send us any statements about his resignation, did not respond calls on his cell phones and home phone from the NEWS to comment about his resignation, attempting to deny you, his former constituents, an explanation. Luckily for you, our dear readers, his attempts failed. Fortunately, his former council colleagues were more than happy to speak to you on the record.

When endorsing his opponent in 2022, we warned voters that Jablow was cowardly in comparison to his predecessors, communicating only second-hand whispers and rumors rather than directly, adding that “the mayor’s office. It offers no armor” … “aversion to bravery is trivial; as mayor, such behavior is perilous for the city.” Contrary to claims, Jablow is not a New Yorker with alligator-thick skin. He refused to return our calls about his resignation, has refused to speak with me because we endorsed his opponent three years ago and refused to shake her hand after their first debate9, an act that “reeked of cowardice, misogyny and disrespect and spoke to the character of both people on stage,” we wrote.

We have been proven right.

Fear is what led to his downfall. Fear of public scrutiny of ALPRs by council and residents, fear his colleagues could not be persuaded by his arguments on issues, fear of staff doing what they were hired to do within the bounds of policy and the law, fear that the city-manager form of government — that places management in the hands of professional administrators he hired — can achieve his desired goals without him having to circumvent it and overstep policy and the law.

We warned voters that Jablow would be, at best, an “adequate” mayor. He turned out to be far less. Far from a high note, Jablow leaves office in disgrace — the first mayor to be censured and the first directly-elected mayor in the city’s history to resign10. He can blame council, or city staffers or this newspaper but none of us repeatedly and relentlessly broke policy, bent procedures, violated rules and lost the public trust.

Now-ex-mayor Scott Jablow did that all on his own.

Christopher Fox Graham, Managing Editor

Kyle Larson, General Manager

Footnotes:

  • 1) Scott Jablow falsely claimed in a self-released press statement that by resigning on Sept. 30, 2025, he was “bringing to a close more than three and a half years of mayoral service,” however, Jablow was only mayor for 34 months and 3 days — or 2 years and 10 months, or 1,038 total days, from Nov. 28, 2022 and Sept. 30, 2025 — less than three years and a full eight months shorter than the “three-and-a-half years” he falsely claimed to have served as mayor.
  • 2) Sept. 10, 2025 Sedona City Council Executive Session Minutes:

Page 1 / 2

Zoom 100%

  • 3) An Facebook post purportedly from Jablow appeared on a Cornville-based Facebook page on Sept. 23. It was removed in about 30 minutes but captured by other Facebook users. Jablow later confirmed the writing the post was his but claimed he did not know how it had appeared online. The person we contacted who posted Jablow’s statement provided erroneous means about how it was obtained and unsubstantiated.
    In the Facebook post, Jablow misstates the headline, claiming: “A recent headline in the local paper reported that this Council must restore trust in our city,” when the actual headline was “Sedona City Council to Mayor Scott Jablow: Resign to restore trust.”
  • 4) Jablow’s Sept. 26 post specifically cites the outside human resources firm that conducted the investigation into Sedona Police Chief Stephanie Foley, though he misspells Revolutionary HR Consultants as “HR Revolutionary.”
  • 5) Sedona City Manager Karen Osburn wrote to Sedona Mayor Scott Jablow on “This isn’t a current project and until it is and until we were to know there is an interest in pursuing this and capacity to implement LPR technology, it wouldn’t be reasonable to do any grant seeking. You continue to pursue this unilaterally without ever having discussed it with council and after I have repeatedly told you that PD is in no position right now to conduct the research necessary to explore how this technology might integrate into their systems, let alone acquire and implement. lt may be even longer before anything, even current and more urgent projects like body worn cameras, can advance due to the current disruptions happening in PD.” Yet on April 6, 2024, Jablow continued to press the issue, contacting Camp Verde Marshal Corey Rowley to ask about Camp Verde’s use of ALPRs, stating his request was for “my own research” and to send the information to him and sidestep the Sedona Police Department and, by extension, Sedona Police Chief Stephanie Foley.
  • 6) Sedona Mayor Scott Jablow told Sedona City Manager Anette Spickard on Nov. 23, 2024, that he does not want the discussion on automated license plate reader cameras to be made public.
  • 7) Objecting to the headline of a May 5, 2023, NEWS story, “Mayor pushes OHV ‘safety’ ban for Sedona,” Sedona Mayor Scott Jablow penned a Guest Perspective, published June 7, that used the word “safety” or a derivative six times.
  • 8) When campaigning for mayor in 2022, then-Sedona Vice Mayor Scott Jablow sent to voters this mailer, misleading voters into believing he had been involved in housing the projects. In the photo are not homebuilders but Sedona Fire Distict Governing Board member Scott Jablow, left, board member Corrie Cooperman and Board Chairman Ty Montgomery. The July 20, 2021, NEWS story referenced in the flyer “Sedona teams up with developer on housing,” is about the Sedona City Council approving “a resolu­tion authorizing the city to enter into a development agreement with Sunset Lofts LLC for the devel­opment of a multi-family workforce apartment complex at 220 Sunset Drive.” According a NEWS story “Sunset Lofts proposal given extension through 2026,” published Nov. 17, 2024, the MK Company of Scottsdale in the story failed to begin work on the project by the first deadline of July 13, 2023, and the second deadline of April 1, 2024, focusing instead on a 60-unit townhome development on Navajo Drive in West Sedona and the city acquired title to the 2.2-acre property and the plans for the proposed 46-unit apartment complex. As of Oct. 2, 2025, the land is still totally vacant.
  • 9) After the Oct. 6, 2022, mayoral debate hosted by Larson Newspapers at the Mary D. Fisher Theatre, then-Sedona Vice Mayor Scott Jablow visibly dodged the offer of a handshake extended by his opponent, Samaire Armstrong. In our Oct. 27, 2022, endorsement of Armstrong for mayor, this visible act of disrespect in from of the gathered crowd opened our editorial, in which we wrote “The younger person, the woman, the single mother, offered her hand. The retired older man, the ex-cop, the elected official, the public servant, refused it. It reeked of cowardice, misogyny and disrespect and spoke to the character of both people on stage. The snub begs many questions: Where does Jablow’s partisanship end? As mayor, will Jablow refuse to shake the hand of Ken Bennett, a Republican running to be our state senator? What of Republicans Selina Bliss or Mark Finchem, should they win their races? Or congressional candidate Eli Crane? Senate hopeful Blake Masters? What about Kari Lake, should she be elected governor? More importantly, what about the Sedona residents who want to serve on city commissions or committees or who receive awards for their service? … that show of disrespect, in our house, as our guests, was unacceptable. We demand that our mayor rise above pettiness to serve all, but it appears Jablow is not yet mature enough for the office he seeks.”
    Bliss and Finchem were elected to the Arizona State Legislature and Crane was elected to Congress.
  • 10) Scott Jablow was Sedona’s 13th elected mayor, the third to resign and the first-directly elected mayor to resign. Mayor Alan Everett resigned in 2002 to run for Congress and Mayor Ruth “Pud” Colquitt resigned in 2005 in order to run for Sedona mayor under new rules allowing voters to directly elect the mayor in the 2006 election.
    Sedona incorprated in 1988 with June Conelison appointed as provisional mayor on the Provisional Sedona City Council and served from January to April 1988. She was elected to the first Sedona City Council and served as Sedona’s first elected vice mayor and second elected mayor.
    From 1998 to 2006, Sedona City Council would vote from among themselves the mayor and vice mayor at the first meeting after the election canvass. Nine mayors of Sedona were elected by this process: Pat Pomphrey (1988-1990); June Conelison (1990-1992), Thron Riggs (1992-1996); Ivan Finley (1996-1998); Alan Everett (1998 until his resignation Jan 8, 2002, to run for Arizona Congressional District 1); Anita McFarlane (January to May 2002); Dick Ellis (2002-2004); Ruth “Pud” Colquitt (2004 to December 2005. She resigned in order to legally be able to run in Sedona’s first direct election for mayor). Susan Solomon (December 2005 to June 2006).
    After 2006, voters directly elected the mayor to a two-year term. Sedona City Council would vote from among themselves the vice mayor at the first meeting after the election canvass. There have been four mayors elected by this process: Ruth “Pud” Colquitt (2006-2008), Rob Adams (2008-2010, 2010-2012, 2012-2014), Sandy Moriarty (2014-2016, 2016-2018, 2018-2020, 2020-2022), Scott Jablow (2022-2024, 2024 to 5 p.m. Sept. 30, 2025), Holli Ploog (acting mayor from 5 p.m. Sept. 30, 2025, to present).

Sedona Mayor Scott Jablow resigns

Pete Furman · September 30, 2025 ·

Sedona Mayor Scott Jablow resigns – Sedona Red Rock News

Sedona Mayor Scott Jablow announced his resignation on Tuesday, Sept. 30. Jablow was censured by a majority of council who called for his resignation on Wednesday, Sept. 10 as seen here. David Jolkovksi/Larson Newspapers

Sedona Mayor Scott Jablow announced his resignation “effective today at 5 p.m.,” on Tuesday, Sept. 30, in a 7:51 a.m. email to City Attorney Kurt Christianson.

Vice Mayor Holli Ploog will step in as the acting mayor until the council meets on Tuesday, Oct. 14, at which point the council will vote on the interim mayor who will serve until November 2026 when Jablow’s term was to end.

The resignation comes after Jablow lost the support of city staff, his colleagues on the City Council and several online petitions calling for his resignation.

Jablow did not respond to a request from the NEWS to comment about his resignation by the time of this publication.

A screenshot of Sedona Mayor Scott Jablow’s letter of resignation submitted on Tuesday, Sept. 30. Larson Newspapers

“I’m pleased that with the resignation to start the healing process with the community, and the fact that he recognized that his continuous as mayor was a distraction from the work in front of us,” Ploog said.

“I’m disappointed in how things turned out, but Scott did the right thing by resigning,” Councilman Derek Pfaff wrote. “He put the best interests of Sedona and its residents ahead of his own. He should be thanked for that.”

“I’m glad [Jablow’s] changed his mind,” Furman said. “I think it’s good for the community, and it’s time for all of us to move forward.”

“I appreciate [Jablow] coming to the conclusion that his resignation is in the best interest of the community and that we can now move forward productively addressing the matters affecting Sedona,” Councilman Brian Fultz wrote.

“I hope that [Jablow’s] legacy won’t simply be the last few months of his term, and that people will look back at some of the positive things that have occurred and his dedication to the community as we get past this difficult time,” Ploog said.

“This episode has been an unfortunate distraction from the important issues facing out community,” Councilwoman Kathy Kinsella wrote. “I hope we can now move on and work to restore public trust in local government.

Councilwoman Melissa Dunn has not yet responded to a request for comment.

Complaints

Sedona Police Department Chief of Police Stephanie Foley filed a 157-page human resources complaint on July 27 alleging Jablow created a hostile work environment, discriminated against her based on gender and micromanaged SPD police officers.

On Aug. 13, City Council held a public discussion about 11 Flock Safety automatic license plate readers that had been installed in June without council approval. Council members learned that the cameras had been installed without public or council discussion but pushed by Jablow since spring 2024.

Council, through a 6-1 majority consensus, decided to shut off its Automatic License Plate Reader program and have city staff provide a timeline of the installation of the surveillance network that was installed this spring without a vote by council on Wednesday, Aug. 13. Jablow opposed the shutdown.

City Manager Anette Spickard provided council with a 30-page memo on Aug. 17 in which she accused Jablow of “manipulating” her in the installation of the ALPRs to the point his behavior had “damaged my credibility and professional reputation,” with city staff and Sedona residents by not stepping forward taking “responsibility for the direction on this project.”

When Spickard wanted to have the project discussed before council, Jablow emailed Spickard on Wednesday, Nov. 13, that “I would rather not make it public because it’s police related.”

Council voted unanimously Sept. 9 to remove the 11 installed ALPRs and to terminate its contract with Flock Safety, citing issues with Flock’s data security.

“As of Friday, [Sept. 26] a couple of poles still need to be removed but all cameras have been removed,” Deputy City Manager Lauren Browne wrote on Sept. 27.

Censure

Council proceeded to take the “unprecedented action,” according to Councilman Pete Furman of publicly and formally censuring Jablow and calling for his resignation on Wednesday, Sept. 10, for engaging in conduct in violation of Sedona City Council’s Rules and Procedures for:

“1. Interference with city staff/departments, 2. Creating/fostering a hostile work environment, 3. Breaking the confidentiality of attorney/client privilege, 4. Circumvention of city council process, 5. Acting beyond the authority of the office of mayor, 6. Acting unilaterally, 7. Violating principles of ethical conduct for elected officials,” according to the meeting’s action item list.

The censure vote was 5-2, Jablow and Pfaff opposed.

Pfaff’s statement was that it should have been up to the voters in 2026 to decide if Jablow should have remained as mayor.
Prior to the censure, two private reprimands were already given to Jablow about his behavior of the same nature.

Penalties for Censure

Also on Sept. 23, council unanimously voted after an executive session “to investigate allegations made against the mayor on [Friday,] Sept. 19.”

On Tuesday, Sept. 23, during his final regular council meeting, Jablow attempted to read a prepared statement regarding his censure during the council’s Summary of Current Events.

He was cut off by Councilwoman Kathy Kinsella and Christianson for going off topic. Jablow later told the NEWS he would forward his full statement to the press but never followed through. The following day, Wednesday, Sept. 24, a Facebook group based in Cornville briefly posted the full statement before deleting it in about 30 minutes.

Jablow confirmed the writing was his but claimed he did not know how it had appeared online.

Later in the meeting on Tuesday, Sept. 23, council decided to have a work session to have a discussion on a comprehensive review of council’s rules and procedures. The topic was raised by Furman who wants to modify Sedona City Code and the council’s rules to punish council members who have been censured by removing the censured member’s use of city property or suspending their salary for their service. Furman said he sees the punishments being in place until voters decide if they wish to reelect the censured person.

The council work session on rules and procedures has been scheduled for Monday, Oct. 27, at 8 a.m.

“I urge the council to continue to press forward with the disciplinary changes that we will talk about,” Furman said Sept. 30. “It’s important. It applies equally to all of us, and I think we need to get those in place [to] prevent future aberrations.”

On Monday, Sept. 29, council had an executive session to discuss Danielle Dulaney and Richard Speer applications for appointment of Presiding Magistrate Judge — Jablow was not in attendance.


Opening on Council

The mayor’s resignation creates a vacancy on council that residents are encouraged to apply for. The appointee will serve until November 2026, and will have to run in next year’s election if they wish to serve beyond. Within the next few days City Clerk JoAnne Cook will release a press release announcing the vacancy with a three-week application window due back by Monday, Oct. 27. Council will then interview the applicants and appoint a council member.

Sedona City Council looks to add penalties to censure

Pete Furman · September 30, 2025 ·

Sedona City Council looks to add penalties to censure – Sedona Red Rock News

Sedona City Councilwoman Kathy Kinsella and Sedona Mayor Scott Jablow exchange glances after Kinsella and four council members voted to censure the mayor on Sept. 10. On Tuesday, Sept. 23, during council’s Summary of Current Events, Jablow attempted to read a statement addressing the five council members who voted for his censure but was shut down by other council members and Sedona City Attorney Kurt Christianson. David Jolkovski/Larson Newspapers

In the closing moments of the Tuesday, Sept. 23, Sedona City Council meeting, Councilman Pete Furman discussed the possi­bility of modifying council’s rules and Sedona City Code sections to discipline members of council who have been censured.

“I believe we can imple­ment actions like limiting a censured member’s liaison roles or access and use of the Mayor-Council conference room or cell phone, travel expenses or even council payments,” Furman said.

On Wednesday, Sept. 10, council voted 5-2 to both censure Sedona Mayor Scott Jablow and call for his immediate resignation for seven major complaints including creating a hostile work environment, inter­ference with city staff and acting unilaterally.

“I’ve done a lot of reflecting back to the last meeting … because this council took unprecedented action against one of its members,” Furman said. “I believe we were all frustrated at the time that there weren’t any specific or concrete tools to apply disciplinary measures when a member violates our rules, procedures and norms. I’d like to see if there’s support to agendize a council discus­sion of our rules and muni [municipal] code sections. To explore whether they can be modified without violating state law to include specific actions that the council may take after one of its members has been censured.”

Councilwoman Kathy Kinsella said she wanted a full review of council’s rules and procedures that the council, after a short discus­sion, decided will be the direction it will take.

“I was going to ask for support for something that could be considered piece­meal, but also as part of rules and procedures, and that is ensuring greater transpar­ency of council assign­ments … to ensure greater transparency and also to try to eliminate any unilateral decision making as a by-product of council assign­ments,” Councilman Brian Fultz said. “So to your point, Kinsella, I’m fine with it being a broader discussion.”

Furman said those disci­plinary measures could be put in place and could be rescinded by council during a public vote. He added they should also automatically be rescinded if a censured member is reelected.

Jablow and Furman have both announced they are not seeking another term and their seats will be decided next year. Additionally, Fultz has announced he will be running for mayor. Councilwoman Melissa Dunn is seeking reelection.

“We’ll put on the next available work session,” City Attorney Kurt Christianson said.

During the council’s Summary of Current Events Jablow attempted to address his censure and call for resig­nation by the other members of council by also misrepre­senting a headline from the NEWS.

The NEWS wrote one story about the censure with the headline “Sedona City Council to Mayor Scott Jablow: Resign to restore trust” and an editorial with the headline “For the good of Sedona, Mayor Scott Jablow must resign.”

“I would like to [talk] about a project I’ve been working on for the past couple of months,” Jablow said. “A recent headline in the [NEWS] reported that ‘this Council must restore trust in the city.’ I couldn’t agree more, but trust is not only between [the] city and the public. Trust must also exist between the council and all of our employees. In my effort to help restore trust and transparency, I want the public to know that, in my opinion, the five councilors who supported my censure —.”

Councilwoman Kathy Kinsella then cut Jablow off mid-sentence.

“Mr. Mayor, is this a current event?” Christianson then asked.

“It’s a project. Do we not want to be transparent?” Jablow asked.

“No, I agree that the city needs to be transparent, but I believe this doesn’t pertain to anything that’s on the agenda,” Christianson said.

“OK, so you wish me not to continue on the council is saying you wish me not to continue,” Jablow said.

“That’s right,” said Kinsella, who also voted for Jablow’s censure.

Christianson told Jablow he could agendize the item at a future meeting, but the mayor doubted he would have enough support from the council.

“Assuming I would have two others,” Jablow said.

Prior to the public meeting, council’s executive session was devoted to discipling Jablow with the council going behind closed doors shortly after 3:30 p.m. and reconvening at 4:17 p.m. to unani­mously “direct the city attorney to investigate [additional] allega­tions made against the mayor on Sept. 19,” Kinsella said.

“No comment,” Councilman Derek Pfaff said when asked about the nature of these Sept. 19 allegations.

One resident called on Jablow to resign during the call to the public.

Consent Items

Following the Sept. 10 censure of Jablow, council held its first work session of possible development of the Western Gateway for housing and mixed-use development.

On Sept. 23, Council voted 6-1, with Furman opposed, to authorize payment for past services to Dig Studios Inc., but deferred action on the remainder of its contract for the Draft Master Plan of the Western Gateway project. Staff had recommended that council approve an amendment to the contract with Dig to increase payment by $106,921. The firm was first hired by the city in July 2024 to develop and promote a new master plan for the Sedona Cultural Park under a $254,242 contract. Additional revisions and concept designs were cited necessitating increases.

“Other additions to the scope include extra design elements such as base elevations and view sheds along with street-level elevations and views,” the council packet reads.

Dunn said because of the numerous unanswered questions from the work session, including the number of housing units council wants, council should hold off on additional work by Dig until council and staff had more discus­sion and a more clear direction for the Western Gateway before it approves additional expenditures.

Council approved a resolution to be the sponsor of the U.S. Forest Service’s grant application to double the size of the Broken Arrow Trailhead through the Arizona State Parks Off-Highway Vehicle Competitive Grant Program. Council had unanimously approved the possible project during its Aug. 26 meeting.

Council approved an additional $90,000 on the previous not-to-exceed amount of $180,000 for a deal with with CozyHome LLC for home energy retrofitting. The project, started in March 2022, aims to reduce greenhouse gas emis­sions, improve equity and enhance the livability of residences.

The National Society of the Daughters of the American Revolution’s Oak Creek Chapter accepted the city of Sedona’s proc­lamation of National Constitution Week that ran from Sept. 17 through Sept. 23. The week celebrates the Sept. 17, 1787, signing of the U.S. Constitution.

“The Daughters of the American Revolution Oak Creek Chapter was founded [on] June 26, 2006,” the council packet reads. “Our mission is to promote the memory and spirit of the men and women who achieved American indepen­dence. … We display an exhibit on Memorial Day in [Community Library Sedona]. We fund and participate in the placement of National Wreaths Across America. Chapter volunteers will place American Flags at the entrance of the Sedona Heritage Museum.”

The bulk of the Sept. 23 meeting was devoted to the quarterly update of the Sedona in Motion transpor­tation and parking projects that will be covered in a future story.

Furman Confirms He’s Will Not Seek Re-election

Pete Furman · September 26, 2025 ·

Brian Fultz to run for mayor of Sedona in 2026 – Sedona Red Rock News

Brian Fultz

The 2026 election season in Sedona is already beginning to take shape. Councilman Brian Fultz announced his intention to run for mayor, asking voters to elevate him to the city’s top elected office.

Meanwhile, Councilman Pete Furman has confirmed he will not seek reelection.

In addition to two council seats, the third currently held by Councilwoman Melissa Dunn will also be on the ballot — Dunn has confirmed to the NEWS she will be seeking reelection.

The specter of current Mayor Scott Jablow already hangs over the 2026 contest. On Sept. 10, a majority of council members voted to censure Jablow and called for his resignation, citing seven major complaints, including interference with city staff, creating a hostile work environment, and acting unilaterally on city matters.

Additionally, Sedona Police Chief Stephanie Foley filed a human resource complaint against Jablow alleging the creation of a hostile work environment and sexual discrimina­tion. City Manager Anette Spickard sent a separate memo to council accusing Jablow of manipulative behavior in the city’s installation of its now-terminated automatic license plate reader program.

Brian Fultz

“One, because I’ve had a term on council and I have a good understanding of how the city works, and it takes time to learn that,” Fultz said is his pitch to voters. “Second, I’m an analytical thinker and use data to inform my decisions. Third, I’m very stra­tegic. I don’t want to make knee-jerk reactions. I want council to fulfill its role of developing policy and providing staff direction to execute. I’m a strategic thinker in that regard. We’ve got big deci­sions ahead, and I believe I can be an objective, well-reasoned indi­vidual to make good decisions for the community.”

“The mayor serves as a represen­tative of the city, but that doesn’t mean the mayor can be working on establishing policy at a regional or statewide level without that being the policy council has said it wants to pursue,” Fultz said. “There was a disconnect at times; [Jablow] was doing his own thing. A good example would be short-term rentals, and the rest of council didn’t know what [Jablow] was doing. That’s something I want to work on immediately with [the] current council: Redefining roles and responsibilities so we don’t have that disconnect going forward.”

Fultz said he feels he can be the one to restore public trust in the mayoral position.

Furman

Furman, a first-term councilman, said he will not be seeking reelec­tion after having health challenges over his term and is changing his priorities.

“I think I’ve had some effect on some of the internal processes on council — changing our rules, getting us to be a little bit more open [and] also, actively partici­pating in the housing short-term rental discussions.” Furman said is what he is most proud of from his term.

For the good of Sedona, Mayor Scott Jablow must resign

Pete Furman · September 17, 2025 ·

For the good of Sedona, Mayor Scott Jablow must resign – Sedona Red Rock News

Sedona Mayor Scott Jablow listens as five Sedona City Council members list their reasons for why they are voting in public to formally censure him and call for him to resign. Jablow voted against the measure, joined by Councilman Derek Pfaff, and refused to resign.

On Sept. 10, the Sedona City Council voted 5-2 to censure Sedona Mayor Scott Jablow and those five members called on the mayor to immediately resign.

In listening to council members’ comments, it appears Councilman Derek Pfaff would have voted for the measure had it only been about a censure, but the vote to include the demand for resignation was a step too far, as Pfaff said the decision to elect or remove an elected office from office is the decision of voters, not the council.

That nuance aside, a majority vote to censure the mayor means council not only believe Jablow’s behavior warrants reprimand but that it should be public with council members voting on the record.

Jablow has lost the council, the city they were elected to manage and the voters who elected them to represent the elec­torate, wholly undermining his ability to govern effectively as one of the seven.

Among the five were Councilwoman Kathy Kinsella and Vice Mayor Holli Ploog, who have worked alongside Jablow when he was just a councilman before he was elected mayor, two of the colleagues who have known him the longest as an elected official. If they turned against him, they must feel that getting Jablow to behave respectfully, responsibly, ethically and lawfully is beyond repair.

It must be repeated that the council didn’t just censure Jablow, they called for his resignation, which elevates the severity of the issue by his colleagues. Impeachment is not a political tool available to municipal governments in Arizona, but if it were, council would have had the lrds majority to strip Jablow from office. Considering most of council aligns with Jablow’s political ideology and most votes are either unanimous or with Jablow in the majority, the admonish­ment was not political.

Sedona City Councilman Pete Furman, second from right, finishes his comments calling on Sedona Mayor Scott Jablow, center, to resign. Councilman Brian Fultz, left, Councilwoman Melissa Dunn, second from left, Vice Mayor Holli Ploog, third from left, and Councilwoman Kathy Kinsella, third from right, and Furman voted 5-2 to formally censure Jablow and demand he resign. Councilman Derek Pfaff, right, and Jablow voted against the measure. Jablow had been admonished twice before behind closed doors in executive session, which is legally not open to the public.

The censure was not a one-off after a contentious vote by a divided council over a political issue, but actually the third time council had admonished him for his behavior. Per Sedona City Code, the first two reprimands were done behind closed doors in executive session and per the law, council cannot discuss them, so this is a legislative “three strikes and you’re out,” which, as a former law enforcement official, Jablow should be acquainted with.

Council laid out seven reasons for the censure, the afore­mentioned breaking the confidentiality of attorney-client privilege as well as interference with city staff and depart­ments, creating and fostering a hostile work environment, circumvention of City Council process, acting beyond the authority of the office of mayor, acting unilaterally and finally violating the principles of ethical conduct for elected officials.

Instead of focusing on issues facing the city like affordable housing, budget city operations as the economy sours and tax revenues dry up, several zoning projects heading to council, the Sedona Cultural Park/Western Gateway or grants to arts organizations, Sedona residents’ attention is now focused on an internal conflict as Jablow has diverted it away from real city issues. His legacy will not be housing at the Cultural Park or city programs he supports, but rather “the disgraced mayor who didn’t quit when he should have.”

This pressure on Jablow, council and the city, calls for him to resign and his professional and personal reputation will only worsen over time as community members will publicly call for him to resign at council meetings, at public and private events and certainly on social media until he leaves.

The comments on our unbiased and middle-of-the-road news stories on social media are already filled with such demands from residents.

This opening volley of attacks on Jablow will first just be those who opposed his election or oppose his stances on past issues, but it will grow as those indifferent to him will join the chorus followed finally by former supporters and donors who will call on him to quit.

It’s not like Jablow enjoys a vast mandate as it is. He defeated Samaire Armstrong with 56.61% of the vote in 2022 and John Martinez with 54.18% of the vote, but that isn’t the full story. Voter turnout fell from 80.7% in 2022 — a midterm year — to a dismal 44.32% in 2024 — a presidential election year — and Jablow got 1,532 fewer votes in 2024 than in 2022.

That’s a lot of people indifferent to his administration who will be questioning his actions now. We warned readers in 2022 that Jablow would be an adequate mayor, at best a place-holder between more dynamic leaders, but did not expect his tenure to turn into disaster.

If Jablow remains, “why hasn’t he resigned” will be the stomping elephant in the room at every council meeting. Ultimately, Jablow remaining in office is selfish and egotis­tical, both critiques lobbed at Jablow even before last week. Council members said his resignation would “restore trust” in municipal governance and would be the right thing for Sedona. He confirmed to the NEWS on Friday, Sept. 12, he would not run for reelection in 2026, so there is no point in remaining.

If the mayor truly loves the city more than himself, he must resign.

If loves himself more than the city, then he must resign.

Remaining harms the city, period. Jablow must do the right thing and resign.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2
  • Go to page 3
  • Go to page 4
  • Go to page 5
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 19
  • Go to Next Page »

FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY • HONESTY • OPEN GOVERNMENT

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Sedona City Councilmember Pete Furman

Copyright © 2026 | Paid for by Pete Furman | Website by Pivot Strategies, Inc.

  • Home
  • About Pete
  • In the News
  • City Meetings
  • Contact Pete